Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudpiroth
I admit that I have watched pornography. But it's from a site that I can trust. It's called Beautiful Agony. It's up for debate whether it can actually be called porn.
|
Ah, yes. I've seen that before.
Just as Cloudpiroth said, they only shoot footage of the face (and some of the chest, but not showing breasts or anything) and show which muscles tense or relax during masturbation (in both men and women) and orgasm.
It's not really porn in my view, but more rather for scientifical study. But like CP also said, it's up for debate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewelynikki
Pornography Sucks U.U
I Mean, Why Must You Live On Someone Other Sex Realtions?? Why Must You Be SO DESPERATE, And Put The EXCUSE OF"It's A Way Of Art" While You Know You Just Use Pornography To
**Spoilers**
Oil Your Meat
U.U |
Well, some of it really is for the sake of art. Less of "oh look, he/she's naked!" and more of "I like the detail of the brush stroke on the hips, but they could use a fan brush to really show the texture of the skin" and "why would the artist draw him/her in this position? Was it to reinforce her sexual influence on society, or that she was forced into this position by someone else?"
But, there is some truth that a lot of it is just for pleasure, not all of it is. In fact, there was one picture I saw that was truly art, where it was a woman nude, but her body was trapped in what looked like metal bars (as if they were going through her body naturally). It was so interesting that I had actually saved it, but lost it from the last computer wipe trying to get rid of some adware.